Skip to content

Commit 9cc7249

Browse files
Change inputs to textareas
1 parent bdcfc46 commit 9cc7249

File tree

1 file changed

+6
-6
lines changed

1 file changed

+6
-6
lines changed

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/new Harvest source.yml

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,47 +4,47 @@ labels: [new Harvest]
44
title: 'New Harvest: <repository-name>'
55

66
body:
7-
- type: input
7+
- type: textarea
88
attributes:
99
label: Discoverability
1010
description: How are the packages for this language discovered? Is the repository searched by the build tooling without the user having to customize their client?
1111
validations:
1212
required: true
1313

1414
body:
15-
- type: input
15+
- type: textarea
1616
attributes:
1717
label: Primary Source
1818
description: Is this the primary repository that the package is published to? Or is this repository a mirror of an existing repository? We should always harvest from primary sources.
1919
validations:
2020
required: true
2121

2222
body:
23-
- type: input
23+
- type: textarea
2424
attributes:
2525
label: Reputability
2626
description: Is this repository operated by a reputable organization? What is the purpose behind running this repository? Is there an identifiable team that can be reached in the event of any issues?
2727
validations:
2828
required: true
2929

3030
body:
31-
- type: input
31+
- type: textarea
3232
attributes:
3333
label: Security
3434
description: How secure is the repository? Is there a team that is available to handle issues in a timely manner when they arise? How fast do they respond to issues, such as when a security vulnerability is planted as a backdoor in a package?
3535
validations:
3636
required: true
3737

3838
body:
39-
- type: input
39+
- type: textarea
4040
attributes:
4141
label: Automation
4242
description: Does the repository support an API to support pulling of information? If not, is the package index organized in a schematized format that can programmatically queried using the package name and version and queried using HTTP(s). When using HTTP to mine data, ClearlyDefined should check for the existence of robots.txt or robot headers that indicate such mining is unacceptable. How much effort is it to automate the process?
4343
validations:
4444
required: true
4545

4646
body:
47-
- type: input
47+
- type: textarea
4848
attributes:
4949
label: Relationship
5050
description: Reach out to the organization that maintains the repository to indicate that ClearlyDefined wishes to harvest data from their repository, with an explanation on how harvesting is done, what the data is used for and how much additional traffic this could result in. Identify/Resolve any concerns and provide a contact from ClearlyDefined in the event they need to support in case of an issue.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)