Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
adding a proxy option here sounds good. why don't you create a pull request with the suggested enhancement? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Probably also need it update AWS SDK https://github.com/verdaccio/verdaccio/pull/2574/files which has been tried already. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
FYI, A diff is created to support the proxy feature: verdaccio/monorepo#713 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is your feature request related to a problem?
in our setup, verdaccio cannot connect to the internet directly. we need to support proxy option on s3 request.
Describe the solution you'd like
aws-sdk supports to pass the proxy option to the httpOptions setting of your config object as stated in https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-js/blob/589d3b570e8cbf24976b7ce4606952be3363e2a0/doc-src/guide/Examples.md#using-proxies.
we would like to setup an option to pass the proxy to the s3 client as in https://github.com/verdaccio/monorepo/blob/main/plugins/aws-s3-storage/src/s3PackageManager.ts#L44.
Describe alternatives you've considered
adopt the proxy setting from Environment variable if presents
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions