ksmbd: fix recursive locking in vfs helpers

[ Upstream commit 807252f ]

Running smb2.rename test from Samba smbtorture suite against a kernel built
with lockdep triggers a "possible recursive locking detected" warning.

This is because mnt_want_write() is called twice with no mnt_drop_write()
in between:
  -> ksmbd_vfs_mkdir()
    -> ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_create()
       -> kern_path_create()
          -> filename_create()
            -> mnt_want_write()
       -> mnt_want_write()

Fix this by removing the mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write calls from vfs
helpers that call kern_path_create().

Full lockdep trace below:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.6.0-rc5 torvalds#775 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/1:1/32 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_mkdir+0xe1/0x410

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(sb_writers#5);
  lock(sb_writers#5);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

4 locks held by kworker/1:1/32:
 #0: ffff8880064e4138 ((wq_completion)ksmbd-io){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980
 #1: ffff888005b0fdd0 ((work_completion)(&work->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980
 #2: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260
 #3: ffff8880057ce760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x123/0x260

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 40b268d ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions")
Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Author: Marios Makassikis

fs/smb/server/vfs.c

@@ -174,10 +174,6 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_create(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	err = mnt_want_write(path.mnt);
-	if (err)
-		goto out_err;
-
 	mode |= S_IFREG;
 	err = vfs_create(mnt_user_ns(path.mnt), d_inode(path.dentry),
 			 dentry, mode, true);
@@ -187,9 +183,7 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_create(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
 	} else {
 		pr_err("File(%s): creation failed (err:%d)\n", name, err);
 	}
-	mnt_drop_write(path.mnt);
 
-out_err:
 	done_path_create(&path, dentry);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -220,10 +214,6 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_mkdir(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	err = mnt_want_write(path.mnt);
-	if (err)
-		goto out_err2;
-
 	user_ns = mnt_user_ns(path.mnt);
 	mode |= S_IFDIR;
 	err = vfs_mkdir(user_ns, d_inode(path.dentry), dentry, mode);
@@ -234,21 +224,19 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_mkdir(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *name, umode_t mode)
 			       dentry->d_name.len);
 		if (IS_ERR(d)) {
 			err = PTR_ERR(d);
-			goto out_err1;
+			goto out_err;
 		}
 		if (unlikely(d_is_negative(d))) {
 			dput(d);
 			err = -ENOENT;
-			goto out_err1;
+			goto out_err;
 		}
 
 		ksmbd_vfs_inherit_owner(work, d_inode(path.dentry), d_inode(d));
 		dput(d);
 	}
 
-out_err1:
-	mnt_drop_write(path.mnt);
-out_err2:
+out_err:
 	done_path_create(&path, dentry);
 	if (err)
 		pr_err("mkdir(%s): creation failed (err:%d)\n", name, err);
@@ -666,16 +654,11 @@ int ksmbd_vfs_link(struct ksmbd_work *work, const char *oldname,
 		goto out3;
 	}
 
-	err = mnt_want_write(newpath.mnt);
-	if (err)
-		goto out3;
-
 	err = vfs_link(oldpath.dentry, mnt_user_ns(newpath.mnt),
 		       d_inode(newpath.dentry),
 		       dentry, NULL);
 	if (err)
 		ksmbd_debug(VFS, "vfs_link failed err %d\n", err);
-	mnt_drop_write(newpath.mnt);
 
 out3:
 	done_path_create(&newpath, dentry);