-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Feature Request: Surface the underlying object #21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@joshribakoff-sm Thanks. I think you can do by |
Interesting, thanks for the heads up! Why not surface this on your main readme? There is no way I would have found this on my own 😆 |
@joshribakoff-sm I have written like
|
Bottom line is that it wasn't clear (to me). I would suggest to reword it better (such as grammar), and inline the example into the main readme. Something like:
Below this, there could be two headings labelled "extending schema server side with directives", "extending schema client side with It also doesn't work. See the resulting type error I get when following the example: Looks like the underlying |
@joshribakoff-sm thanks for reporting. About documentation, welcome PR. |
This cannot be extended, instead my idea is to have an option so it outputs this:
I could then import
updateUserRequestFields
and extend it prior to passing it toz.object()
in the consuming codeIt could also optionally append:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: