Remove logs-app from SDS spec codeowners (#2100)

Co-authored-by: ci.datadog-api-spec <[email protected]>

Author: api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]

.apigentools-info

@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
     "spec_versions": {
         "v1": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2024-11-12 21:11:37.117849",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "9a869b6b"
+            "regenerated": "2024-11-13 15:00:41.714511",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "1406acd6"
         },
         "v2": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.6",
-            "regenerated": "2024-11-12 21:11:37.136968",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "9a869b6b"
+            "regenerated": "2024-11-13 15:00:41.733043",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "1406acd6"
         }
     }
 }

features/v2/sensitive_data_scanner.feature

@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     And a valid "appKeyAuth" key in the system
     And an instance of "SensitiveDataScanner" API
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Group returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "CreateScanningGroup" request
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"filter": {}, "product_list": ["logs"]}, "relationships": {"configuration": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_configuration"}}, "rules": {"data": [{"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}]}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Group returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And new "CreateScanningGroup" request
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     And the response "data.type" is equal to "sensitive_data_scanner_group"
     And the response "data.attributes.name" is equal to "{{ unique }}"
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Create Scanning Rule returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -50,23 +50,23 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     And the response "data.attributes.included_keyword_configuration.character_count" is equal to 35
     And the response "data.attributes.included_keyword_configuration.keywords[0]" is equal to "credit card"
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Group returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Group returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Group returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -76,23 +76,23 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "DeleteScanningRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Delete Scanning Rule returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -103,13 +103,13 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List Scanning Groups returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "ListScanningGroups" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List Scanning Groups returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -118,19 +118,19 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     Then the response status is 200 OK
     And the response "included" has item with field "id" with value "{{ group.data.id }}"
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List standard patterns returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "ListStandardPatterns" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @integration-only @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @integration-only @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: List standard patterns returns "OK" response
     Given new "ListStandardPatterns" request
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Reorder Groups returns "Bad Request" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @replay-only @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @replay-only @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Reorder Groups returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -148,23 +148,23 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Group returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "UpdateScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"filter": {}, "product_list": ["logs"]}, "relationships": {"configuration": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_configuration"}}, "rules": {"data": [{"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}]}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Group returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateScanningGroup" request
     And request contains "group_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"filter": {}, "product_list": ["logs"]}, "relationships": {"configuration": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_configuration"}}, "rules": {"data": [{"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}]}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Group returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system
@@ -185,15 +185,15 @@ Feature: Sensitive Data Scanner
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
-  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @generated @skip @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateScanningRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
     And body with value {"data": {"attributes": {"excluded_namespaces": ["admin.name"], "included_keyword_configuration": {"character_count": 30, "keywords": ["credit card", "cc"]}, "namespaces": ["admin"], "tags": [], "text_replacement": {"type": "none"}}, "relationships": {"group": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_group"}}, "standard_pattern": {"data": {"type": "sensitive_data_scanner_standard_pattern"}}}, "type": "sensitive_data_scanner_rule"}, "meta": {"version": 0}}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
-  @team:DataDog/logs-app @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
+  @team:DataDog/sensitive-data-scanner
   Scenario: Update Scanning Rule returns "OK" response
     Given a valid "configuration" in the system
     And there is a valid "scanning_group" in the system