Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
- Always use conventional commits when writing commit messages.
- Always use test-driven development (TDD) practices.
- Always update documentation (
README.md,CONTRIBUTING.md, any relevant files indocs/) when updating code - Always update
skills/rw-skill.mdwhen adding, removing, or modifying anyrwcommand or flag (except:auth,api,update, orconfig) - Always mock network boundaries in tests
Documentation of rw configuration files is in docs/config.md.
Documentation of the RoundingWell API is in docs/json-api.md.
cargo build --release # Build (binary output: target/release/rw)
cargo install --path . # Install to ~/.cargo/bin/rw
cargo test # Run all tests
cargo test <name> # Run a single test by name
cargo fmt # Format
cargo fmt --check # Verify formatting
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings # Lint
cargo audit # Audit dependencies for security advisories- Run
cargo clippyandcargo fmtafter changes - Run
cargo testbeforecargo build
- Use semantic versioning for tagging versions
- Never use a
vprefix for tagging versions (e.g. use1.5.2notv1.5.2) - Only update
CHANGELOG.mdwhen drafting a release - Update the compare links when updating CHANGELOG.md
- Call out BREAKING changes with a warning
⚠️ symbol - Skip
ciandbuildcommits
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.