Does the rewrite involve this? [Downloading, Codecs, UX]

[n-ce]

Checklist

• I made sure that there are no existing issues or discussions - open or closed - which I could contribute my information to.
• I have read the FAQ and my question isn't listed.
• I have taken the time to fill in all the required details. I understand that the question will be dismissed otherwise.
• I have read and understood the contribution guidelines.

What is/are your question(s)?

The download prompt currently only asks for video quality
can we have audio quality selection as well (not the separate one).
Like I am pretty sure most 144p video downloaders don't need 130kbps audio, so we must either smartly include a lower quality audio or let the user choose what quality they want to use.

Why this matters?
Let's take this video for a reference : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GWB9ApTPTv4

The 480p AV1 videostream costs 93MB
The 251 audiostream costs 142MB
so 93+142 = 235MB

More than the videostream? That's stupid from the user point of view and what about 600 audiostream? It's just 44MB.

That's a 100MB of a difference!

(Alongside the quality I also hope some transparency is there about the codecs being used)

This is the only reason I am using yt-dlp instead of NewPipe.

Additional information

No response

[ShareASmile]

This needs download refactor. After rewrite it will be looked into whether ditch old downloader in favour of a new one or not. You can follow its dedicated issue on the tracker.