Skip to content

contributing guide needs branch guidance #30

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
akaszynski opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31
Closed

contributing guide needs branch guidance #30

akaszynski opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #31
Assignees

Comments

@akaszynski
Copy link
Contributor

akaszynski commented Jan 17, 2022

We originally had branch guidance setup in

Branch Naming Conventions

To streamline development, we have the following requirements for naming branches. These requirements help the core developers know what kind of changes any given branch is introducing before looking at the code.

fix/: any bug fixes, patches, or experimental changes that are minor

feat/: any changes that introduce a new feature or significant addition

junk/: for any experimental changes that can be deleted if gone stale

maint/: for general maintenance of the repository or CI routines

doc/: for any changes only pertaining to documentation

no-ci/: for low impact activity that should NOT trigger the CI routines

testing/: improvements or changes to testing

release/: releases (see below)

Let's add that back in or include a reference to that.

@PipKat PipKat linked a pull request Jan 17, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants