Skip to content

Licenses #485

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
LunaticMuch opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Licenses #485

LunaticMuch opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@LunaticMuch
Copy link

I think #368 and #482 opened an interesting point on licence management.

While #482 is going to be address with 0.3.4, other issue with imagescript remains.
AGPL license might not be an option accepted in many business settings and therefore would make the whole contentlayer a no-go.

I believe it should be consider to make the image piece optional as an extension so that you pull the extension and its dependencies only if you can accept the license.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 11, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale label Aug 11, 2023
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Aug 21, 2023
@itrich
Copy link

itrich commented Nov 6, 2023

Hi @LunaticMuch,

as of today, the ImageScript project now clearly indicates that it can be either used under MIT OR AGPL. See matmen/ImageScript#32

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants