Replies: 3 comments
-
Yeah, I think it could be useful. I'm linking related discussion #57. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Relevant proposal for spec change #106. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
This is now part of the main specification, closing the discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Right now if we have recipes that call for specific types of ingredients, such as rolled oats vs. steel-cut oats, we have to list all of them in the aisle definition and write out the full names in the recipes. While we can do something like
steel-cut #oats
in the recipe if we don't want to have to write out everything, that doesn't translate to the shopping list.Both options are a little awkward and the more common practice in cookbooks to denote ingredients as "oats, steel-cut" or "oats (steel-cut)" only in the ingredient list. In the cooking steps, you just say "oats".
I propose the ingredient syntax be updated to include variants/adjectives, perhaps separate by a pipe?
Something like this:
In the recipe steps it would render as:
In the shopping list, however, you'd see:
And because the core ingredients are just "oats", "raisins", and "coconut", that's all you'd have to list in the aisle definition.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions