We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi !
I have updated "coverlet.collector" Version="3.0.1" with the fix you provided on severe coverage loss in 3.0.0.
Even if the situation is clearly better, I am still missing some coverage with lambda "chained".
I saw on this commit you worked on the lambda coverage, but the tests doesn't take in account scenarios like the screenshot below
Modifying the code to be on a single line will correct the coverage OK 👍
Thanks you in advance for support ;-)
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yep it's a dup of #1056 is fixed on master this weekend I'll release the fix officially. You can try with nightly for now https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet/blob/master/Documentation/ConsumeNightlyBuild.md
Sorry, something went wrong.
Nice ! Thanks for answer regards
No branches or pull requests
Hi !
I have updated "coverlet.collector" Version="3.0.1" with the fix you provided on severe coverage loss in 3.0.0.
Even if the situation is clearly better, I am still missing some coverage with lambda "chained".
I saw on this commit you worked on the lambda coverage, but the tests doesn't take in account scenarios like the screenshot below
Modifying the code to be on a single line will correct the coverage OK 👍
Thanks you in advance for support ;-)
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: