Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I would love to this as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I haven't done it myself but I think I've seen people on the Dagster slack solve this by putting the steps they want to complete in sequence in a nested graph. So in your case I'm not sure if that syntax is correct, it might be necessary to use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What's the issue?
I'm using Dagster v1.10 and trying to build a job that performs the following steps:
Desired Execution Flow
generate_partitions() ──> process_partition() ──> upload_partition() (runs in parallel)Current setup
note:
I tried to use the graph but no success as well...
Problem
Dagster waits for all dynamic outputs from generate_partitions and all process_partition ops to complete before running any upload_partition op.
But I want each upload_partition to start as soon as its corresponding process_partition finishes.
What did you expect to happen?
How can I get Dagster to execute the upload step as soon as its matching processing step finishes, instead of waiting for all partitions to complete first?
Is this possible in Dagster v1.10?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions