graphql-ws to graphql-transport-ws Protocol work #114
Closed
djpritchett
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thank you for warm words. I happy to redirect these words to my team: @sergey-komissarov, @AlexzAK, @denis.sheronov, @herclogon. I believe we will integrate these changes into the master branch and issue a new RC quite soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
big thumbs up for @prokher for updating ([switch-from-graphql-transport-ws-to-graphql-ws-subprotocol])(https://github.com/datadvance/DjangoChannelsGraphqlWs/tree/switch-from-graphql-transport-ws-to-graphql-ws-subprotocol)) the most confusing issue I have ran into in a long while graphql-transport-ws TO graphql-ws subprotocol
which as we know means graphql-ws to graphql-transport-ws
seriously though, thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions