Do you have any explanation for this one?
This likely leads to duplicate code. You set the same default value in multiple overloads. Change one, forget the others (even though they're close to each other), and you have a problem. Your sample code would happily work if each overload only adds the next parameter and lets the other overloads add all other parameters. This way, you only add one parameter per overload and only have each value in a single place.
Obviously, if leaving out multiple parameters requires to set a number of different values, calling a longer overload is necessary. But that comes from a functional requirement.
I'd make the phrase about the order of parameters in all overloads the main point and leave out the rest.
Do you have any explanation for this one?
This likely leads to duplicate code. You set the same default value in multiple overloads. Change one, forget the others (even though they're close to each other), and you have a problem. Your sample code would happily work if each overload only adds the next parameter and lets the other overloads add all other parameters. This way, you only add one parameter per overload and only have each value in a single place.
Obviously, if leaving out multiple parameters requires to set a number of different values, calling a longer overload is necessary. But that comes from a functional requirement.
I'd make the phrase about the order of parameters in all overloads the main point and leave out the rest.