Skip to content

Option to skip negotiation option for SignalR C++ client #21386

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wegylexy opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Option to skip negotiation option for SignalR C++ client #21386

wegylexy opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers ✔️ Resolution: Duplicate Resolved as a duplicate of another issue Status: Resolved
Milestone

Comments

@wegylexy
Copy link
Contributor

To avoid using sticky sessions, the client needs to skip negotiation and uses WebSockets. Since the C++ client only supports WebSockets anyway, there should also be a way to skip negotiation.
It could be .skip_negotiation(true) with the hub connection builder.

@Pilchie Pilchie added the area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers label May 1, 2020
@analogrelay analogrelay added this to the Next sprint planning milestone May 1, 2020
@analogrelay
Copy link
Contributor

We have an item tracking work to get the C++ client up-to-speed with the options in the other clients. I'm going to close this as a duplicate of that one (but I made sure to call out "skip negotiation" specifically since it's definitely an important one).

Duplicate of #8716

@analogrelay analogrelay added the ✔️ Resolution: Duplicate Resolved as a duplicate of another issue label May 3, 2020
@ghost ghost added the Status: Resolved label May 3, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-signalr Includes: SignalR clients and servers ✔️ Resolution: Duplicate Resolved as a duplicate of another issue Status: Resolved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants