You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I am right, classes under System.Configuration namespace are missing. I know asp.net 5 introduces some new json-based configuration mechanism but the old xml-based configurations are still widely used. Moving System.Configuraiton to corefx will benefit a lot of legacy code.
Kind regards,
Karl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello corefx team, is this namespace coming over, or should we be looking to implement reading from config and custom configuration sections differently?
Hi folks, this is Eilon from the ASP.NET team. There are no current plans to bring the System.Configuration types to corefx.
The new Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration is a great alternative way to have structured, layered, testable, DI-friendly configuration data and settings, including many built-in config sources, such as: command line args, environment variables, INI files, JSON files, XML files, and per-machine user secrets.
Though it's not intended as an exact replacement for System.Configuration, it does provide a lightweight, yet powerful way of reading configuration data.
The new library also includes functionality for binding configuration data to strongly-typed POCO objects.
Hi corefx team,
If I am right, classes under System.Configuration namespace are missing. I know asp.net 5 introduces some new json-based configuration mechanism but the old xml-based configurations are still widely used. Moving System.Configuraiton to corefx will benefit a lot of legacy code.
Kind regards,
Karl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: