You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During the bugfix for #350 and #378 in PR #570 the static initialization of KnownAssemblyInfoRecord on BamlMapTable was moved into the constructor while keeping the initialized field static. This can lead to potential race conditions when the BamlMapTable is instantiated multiple times on separate threads.
Considering the post-merge comments in the PR its probably safe to make the field an instance field instead of a static field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
During the bugfix for #350 and #378 in PR #570 the static initialization of
KnownAssemblyInfoRecord
onBamlMapTable
was moved into the constructor while keeping the initialized field static. This can lead to potential race conditions when theBamlMapTable
is instantiated multiple times on separate threads.Considering the post-merge comments in the PR its probably safe to make the field an instance field instead of a static field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: