Skip to content

ESP32-S3 DevKit 8MB partition scheme mislabeled #7113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 task done
cmsavage opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #7120
Closed
1 task done

ESP32-S3 DevKit 8MB partition scheme mislabeled #7113

cmsavage opened this issue Aug 10, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #7120
Assignees
Labels
Status: To be implemented Selected for Development
Milestone

Comments

@cmsavage
Copy link

Board

ESP32-S3-DevKitC

Device Description

N/A

Hardware Configuration

N/A

Version

v2.0.4

IDE Name

Arduino IDE

Operating System

Windows 10

Flash frequency

N/A

PSRAM enabled

yes

Upload speed

N/A

Description

For the ESP32-S3 Dev Module, the 8MB partition scheme is listed as "8M Flash (3MB APP/1.5MB FAT)", but the corresponding default_8MB.csv file shows SPIFFS is used, not FAT. For consistency with other partition schemes, the relevant boards.txt line should be something like:
esp32s3.menu.PartitionScheme.default_8MB=8M Flash (3MB APP/1.5MB SPIFFS)

There is also a lack of consistency between the various partition scheme labels: ffat/FAT/FATFS, spiffs/SPIFFS, two entries labeled as default, etc.

Sketch

N/A

Debug Message

N/A

Other Steps to Reproduce

No response

I have checked existing issues, online documentation and the Troubleshooting Guide

  • I confirm I have checked existing issues, online documentation and Troubleshooting guide.
@cmsavage cmsavage added the Status: Awaiting triage Issue is waiting for triage label Aug 10, 2022
@SuGlider SuGlider added Status: To be implemented Selected for Development and removed Status: Awaiting triage Issue is waiting for triage labels Aug 10, 2022
@SuGlider
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, you are right, thanks for reporting!
It deserves a full review of all the schemes, names and files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: To be implemented Selected for Development
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants