Robot name uniqueness clarification #765
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
exercises/robot-name/description.md
Outdated
| Random names means a risk of collisions. Your solution should not allow | ||
| the use of the same name twice when avoidable. In some exercism language | ||
| tracks there are tests to ensure that the same name is never used twice. | ||
| Random names means a risk of collisions. Your solution should ensure that |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was wondering if we should replace "should" with something more strong, like "must".
ErikSchierboom
approved these changes
May 9, 2017
emcoding
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2018
meta: Remove the pull request template.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous description of this problem was unclear about
This patch removes the ambiguity by clearly stating that "every existing robot has a unique name."
This PR is an alternative to #748 which seeks to make the name uniqueness an extension,
and #731 which proposes removing it completely.
(commits can be squashed.)