We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http://exercism.io/submissions/bc21579f3bf54f6d99a39093d8396157
A member of my Kata group reports that all tests pass with that implementation. It's, uh, very concise. But I don't think it's accurate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The simple fix for this is an extra test for checking for unique return values, so I threw together the pull request for that.
That implementation above still passes all the other tests, so there may be a better way to do it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
http://exercism.io/submissions/bc21579f3bf54f6d99a39093d8396157
A member of my Kata group reports that all tests pass with that implementation. It's, uh, very concise. But I don't think it's accurate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: