Skip to content

Regression with process substitution (<(echo foo)) #2325

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 task done
michaelblyons opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task done

Regression with process substitution (<(echo foo)) #2325

michaelblyons opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@michaelblyons
Copy link

  • I was not able to find an open or closed issue matching what I'm seeing

Setup

  • 64-bit Git
$ git --version --build-options

git version 2.23.0.windows.1
cpu: x86_64
built from commit: 4db2e5cc9e1522131a039cbad3970f147a39f0ce
sizeof-long: 4
sizeof-size_t: 8
  • Which version of Windows are you running? Vista, 7, 8, 10? Is it 32-bit or 64-bit?
$ cmd.exe /c ver

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.14393]
  • What options did you set as part of the installation? Or did you choose the
    defaults?
$ cat /etc/install-options.txt

Editor Option: VIM
Custom Editor Path:
Path Option: Cmd
SSH Option: OpenSSH
Tortoise Option: false
CURL Option: OpenSSL
CRLF Option: CRLFAlways
Bash Terminal Option: MinTTY
Performance Tweaks FSCache: Enabled
Use Credential Manager: Enabled
Enable Symlinks: Disabled
Enable Builtin Interactive Add: Disabled
  • Any other interesting things about your environment that might be related
    to the issue you're seeing?

Worked with v2.21.0.windows.1 but no longer with v2.23.0.windows.1

Details

  • Which terminal/shell are you running Git from? e.g Bash/CMD/PowerShell/other

Bash

 mapfile -t foo < <(echo -e "bar\nbaz")
  • What did you expect to occur after running these commands?

$foo contains (bar, baz)

  • What actually happened instead?

bash: /dev/fd/62: No such file or directory

@rimrul
Copy link
Member

rimrul commented Sep 9, 2019

This seems to be a duplicate of #2291 and #2322.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants