Skip to content

Allow specified actions and reusable workflows doesn't mention separator #35564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 task done
jsoref opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #35595
Closed
1 task done

Allow specified actions and reusable workflows doesn't mention separator #35564

jsoref opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #35595
Labels
content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team organizations Content related to organizations

Comments

@jsoref
Copy link
Contributor

jsoref commented Dec 6, 2024

Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/organizations/managing-organization-settings/disabling-or-limiting-github-actions-for-your-organization#allowing-select-actions-and-reusable-workflows-to-run

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

Some text in Allow specified actions and reusable workflows should specify that the separator between actions is ,.

Additional information

If you edit a repository/organization that already has items in the list, you won't see the hint that items in the list need to be , separated and the error you get when you try to use an action that you think you've allowed (by adding it after a space) isn't helpful.

For my reference, I spoke to support about this and they agreed it wouldn't be unreasonable to adjust the docs.

@jsoref jsoref added the content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team label Dec 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Dec 6, 2024
@nguyenalex836
Copy link
Contributor

@jsoref Thank you for raising this issue! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ Our team will provide feedback regarding the best next steps for this issue - thanks for your patience! 💛

@nguyenalex836 nguyenalex836 added waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review organizations Content related to organizations and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Dec 6, 2024
@subatoi
Copy link
Contributor

subatoi commented Dec 9, 2024

Many thanks @jsoref — if you're happy to go ahead and raise a contribution for this, please go ahead: it obviously does need documenting and I agree with your suggested placement. I don't expect to have many suggestions in a PR you'd raise for this, if any, but in any case that's the best path forward at this point.

Thanks as ever for opening an issue first!

@nguyenalex836 nguyenalex836 removed the waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review label Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team organizations Content related to organizations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants