-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
Incoming mail didn't work on issue creation #23651
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
The bug is even more serious by the fact that the mail states "View on Gitea or reply directly to this mail". These replies will all be lost. The same applies to the mails when closing an issue. Once again the text "View on Gitea or reply directly to this mail" but a functional reply to Gitea is not possible. |
I don't have this mailbox service configured locally. Can you show the links to the replies for the three scenarios? (Creating an Issue, Commenting on an Issue and Closing an Issue) |
Hi, issue creation: first or later comment: |
Looks like this is fixed by #27997 in main. |
@inMetaNetworks |
We close issues that need feedback from the author if there were no new comments for a month. 🍵 |
Description
Hi,
i tried the new incoming mail feature and it's very nice and working good for me. Except you can't answer to issues when they are created. You can only reply on comments with mail. There is no token generated on issue creation.
v1.19/services/mailer/mail.go#L335
I'm not sure if it's a bug or design. For the background: I "misuse" gitea as an dead simple helpdesk for some people and it's great! Simple setup and nearly zero maintenance, ad/ldap connectivity and so on. And the new incoming mail feature is awesome for that!
Gitea Version
1.19.0
Can you reproduce the bug on the Gitea demo site?
No
Log Gist
No response
Screenshots
No response
Git Version
No response
Operating System
Debian 11
How are you running Gitea?
Local installations on Debian Bullseye, systemd, pgsql.
Database
PostgreSQL
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: