Skip to content

Conversation

@favadi
Copy link
Contributor

@favadi favadi commented May 18, 2017

Fix #1350

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone May 18, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/bug label May 18, 2017
@ethantkoenig
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label May 18, 2017
@ethantkoenig
Copy link
Member

Let L-G-T-M work

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels May 18, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented May 19, 2017

Can we write some integration test for webhook?

@appleboy
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 19, 2017
@bkcsoft bkcsoft merged commit 977dcf9 into go-gitea:master May 19, 2017
@favadi favadi deleted the fix-wrong-after-field-pull-request branch May 19, 2017 13:52
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Webhook: on merge wrong hash in the after field

6 participants