Skip to content

Conversation

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented Jul 13, 2017

  • Remove unit type commits & settings as they were not working correctly anyway
  • Fix unit type checking as all unit types was always already set before loading user allowed unit types
  • Fix style so that when "Settings" tab is not visible would still be aligned more to left not in all width with lot of space in between tabs.
  • Fix RepoView3 test (user3 is organization and can not be used to log in)
  • Fix invalid unit test (user4 is in team1 so it must have access to repo3, changed test to user5)
  • Allow changing units only for teams with read or write access mode

@lafriks lafriks force-pushed the refactor_repo_tabs branch from bae52aa to b598607 Compare July 13, 2017 20:56
@lafriks lafriks added type/bug type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. labels Jul 13, 2017
@lafriks lafriks force-pushed the refactor_repo_tabs branch 5 times, most recently from 7854784 to fa1b818 Compare July 14, 2017 00:58
@lafriks lafriks force-pushed the refactor_repo_tabs branch from fa1b818 to 275ca0b Compare July 14, 2017 01:06
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Jul 14, 2017

/cc @lunny

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jul 14, 2017
@lafriks lafriks changed the title Remove unit type commits and use unit type code for commits tab Remove unit types commits and settings Jul 14, 2017
@lafriks lafriks requested a review from lunny July 14, 2017 01:20
@lafriks lafriks force-pushed the refactor_repo_tabs branch from 04166cf to 4f9d80a Compare July 14, 2017 02:19
@lafriks lafriks force-pushed the refactor_repo_tabs branch from 7344d6f to 33a01e5 Compare July 14, 2017 20:57
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Jul 14, 2017

Code is ready for review

@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented Jul 14, 2017

FYI tests started to fail after I fixed units functionality thats why I fixed them in this PR

@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jul 14, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jul 15, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jul 15, 2017
@Bwko
Copy link
Member

Bwko commented Jul 16, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jul 16, 2017
@lunny lunny merged commit f33e6ae into go-gitea:master Jul 17, 2017
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants