We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191780 preferring AND over shifts broke the s390x codegen math tests.
I assume the copysign and abs detection introduced in CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/73950/ does not apply anymore.
The ssa optimization rules for s390x will need to be adjusted to detect the new patterns.
cc @mundaym @randall77
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rolling back in https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/193850 as it also broke arm64. Will followup on #33826.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191780 preferring AND over shifts broke the s390x codegen math tests.
I assume the copysign and abs detection introduced in CL https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/73950/ does not apply anymore.
The ssa optimization rules for s390x will need to be adjusted to detect the new patterns.
cc @mundaym @randall77
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: