You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was planning to extend the Bin Packing library with an interface to transform (BKP)/(UKP) -> (KP)/(d-KP)/(MKP) (so you can additionally choose and compress the number of items). However, I don't see a need among users that would justify an extension.
I don't think it's optimal to optimize things that nobody wants to optimize. Therefore, I would like to find out about the needs in the individual areas. Both from the usage side and the development side. As far as I understand it, CP-SAT is the flagship. What are the long term plans and is familiarization desired?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was planning to extend the Bin Packing library with an interface to transform (BKP)/(UKP) -> (KP)/(d-KP)/(MKP) (so you can additionally choose and compress the number of items). However, I don't see a need among users that would justify an extension.
I don't think it's optimal to optimize things that nobody wants to optimize. Therefore, I would like to find out about the needs in the individual areas. Both from the usage side and the development side. As far as I understand it, CP-SAT is the flagship. What are the long term plans and is familiarization desired?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions