You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One potentially useful thing for teams working with complex families of packages would be able to add source code repositories (bonus: ability to pick out branches…). This is quite helpful for synchronisation and avoids time wasted in “oh wait, that's why you're having trouble; you need to pull the lastest git version of the foo dependency from my branch” style discussions in mid-development. For me, getting somebody up and running with this new feature would consist in handing them a list of URIs for sources, and that'd be it.
Alternatives that I'm aware of so far would be to write people scripts (a bit tricky if you have Windows/Unix mixed teams) or to use something like cabal-meta instead (but preferable not to have to give people a new cmd to learn like cabal-dev)
Otherwise, the new cabal sandbox is making me happy. Thanks, devs!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would also be valuable when you need to make updates to someone else's public repo. When you fork, fix and then submit a pull request, it would be great to be able to just point cabal at your fork so that you can keep working on your project. Then, when/if the package maintainer accepts the pull and updates Hackage revert to using it as a primary source.
One potentially useful thing for teams working with complex families of packages would be able to add source code repositories (bonus: ability to pick out branches…). This is quite helpful for synchronisation and avoids time wasted in “oh wait, that's why you're having trouble; you need to pull the lastest git version of the foo dependency from my branch” style discussions in mid-development. For me, getting somebody up and running with this new feature would consist in handing them a list of URIs for sources, and that'd be it.
Alternatives that I'm aware of so far would be to write people scripts (a bit tricky if you have Windows/Unix mixed teams) or to use something like cabal-meta instead (but preferable not to have to give people a new cmd to learn like cabal-dev)
Otherwise, the new cabal sandbox is making me happy. Thanks, devs!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: