-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 710
Improve the user experience around sandboxes with multiple source packages #2631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Is there any of this that a noob such as myself could help with? (And which would have value on as a feature of its own.) |
@BardurArantsson you could have a look at the one "Search upwards for sandbox directory". It shouldn't be hard to implement, and then you'd want to play around with it a bit and see if there's any unexpected issues with that approach. |
Thanks, I'll have a look at that tomorrow (or the day after). Hopefully, it's pretty independent of the rest of all the others? (I think I can already theoretically foresee a few issues wrt. backward compatibility, but we'll see, I guess...) |
@BardurArantsson yeah, should be independent. |
EDIT: Removed comment because it was just noise |
sandbox functionality is removed. |
Setup.hs
file, removing errors related to not having the right version of Cabal installed/available (e.g. when doing parallel builds.) (Allow using cabal program itself as the external setup method #2633)/cc @dcoutts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: