Skip to content

Form a DWebLAM Community? #224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
flyingzumwalt opened this issue Dec 22, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Form a DWebLAM Community? #224

flyingzumwalt opened this issue Dec 22, 2016 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor

Anyone interested in forming a community around Distributed Web in Libraries, Archives and Museums?

Related

@denisnazarov
Copy link

Hey from @mediachain!

Mediachain is a sister project of IPFS (built on top of libp2p).

Mediachain builds upon foundational properties of decentralized/p2p systems (immutability, content-addressing, distributed routing) and adds a decentralized directory and the concept of namespaces to provide a single port of entry for discovering, publishing and collaborating on media metadata (media assets live in IPFS).

We started a community effort to aggregate and decentralize cultural heritage data earlier this year. So far over a million museum works have been aggregated, as well as over 100 million works from Creative Commons image sharing platforms. You can read more about how Mediachain works here.

We'd love to join forces and participate in a DWebLAM community effort!

@edsilv
Copy link

edsilv commented Dec 23, 2016

Hey, I'd love to be involved too. Just to carry on from the Twitter conversation, I've been using riot.im to follow the IPFS IRC and like it as an OSS alternative to slack. Also, big fan of mediachain :-)

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor Author

A couple people have suggested doing this on Slack, possibly in the code4lib Slack (as suggested by @cmh2166 here). I want to do whatever works for the most people. Personally I'm suffering from Slack overload due to the proliferation of Slack teams that I'm obligated to be on.

Would it make sense to try using the new IPFS discourse instance at https://discuss.ipfs.io ?

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor Author

related conversation on twitter https://twitter.com/ennomeijers/status/852561763052793856

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Apr 15, 2017

Regarding Slack and open initiatives: https://dave.cheney.net/2017/04/11/why-slack-is-inappropriate-for-open-source-communications 🙃

I got low key feeling that sub-category in Discourse could improve discovery and cross-pollination.

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've created a "Libraries Archives and Museums" category on discuss.ipfs.io and opened a thread asking Who's using IPFS in Libraries Archives and Museums. I hope you'll all chime in with info, ideas, links and requests for collaborators!

@cmharlow
Copy link

thanks, @lidel !

fwiw, i'm not trying to be a slack apologist here. just wanting some sort of communication coordination for the various threads (some not getting picked up by others) and communication methods already presented.

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor Author

This conversation moved to https://discuss.ipfs.io/t/community-ipfs-in-libraries-archives-and-museums/130

We have had 2 GLAM community calls so far.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants