Skip to content

ECOS v2.0.4 released #33

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
staticfloat opened this issue Nov 9, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

ECOS v2.0.4 released #33

staticfloat opened this issue Nov 9, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@staticfloat
Copy link
Contributor

Hello there, I've been going through updating binary dependencies on Homebrew; is there a reason to disallow ECOS v2.0.4? Can we relax the version constraint at all?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Nov 9, 2015

@tkelman, mind bumping the windows binaries?

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Nov 9, 2015

I'm getting what looks like a test failure on win32

=================================== log(ax)-x ===================================

ECOS 2.0.4 - (C) embotech GmbH, Zurich Switzerland, 2012-15. Web: www.embotech.com/ECOS

It     pcost       dcost      gap   pres   dres    k/t    mu     step   sigma     IR    |   BT
 0  +0.000e+00  -3.542e-01  +3e+00  6e-01  5e-01  1e+00  1e+00    ---    ---    0  0  - |  -  -
 1  -2.218e+00  -1.244e+00  +6e-01  3e-01  3e-01  2e+00  2e-01  0.7833  9e-03   1  1  1 |  1  1
 2  -1.463e+00  -9.302e-01  +1e-01  1e-01  9e-02  8e-01  4e-02  0.7833  9e-03   1  1  1 |  1  1
 3  -8.061e-01  -6.379e-01  +2e-02  3e-02  2e-02  2e-01  8e-03  0.7833  9e-03   1  1  1 |  1  1
 4  -7.249e-01  -6.910e-01  +4e-03  7e-03  5e-03  5e-02  2e-03  0.7784  1e-02   1  1  1 |  1  1
 5  -6.864e-01  -6.773e-01  +9e-04  2e-03  1e-03  1e-02  4e-04  0.7833  9e-03   1  1  1 |  1  1
 6  -6.822e-01  -6.804e-01  +2e-04  4e-04  3e-04  2e-03  1e-04  0.7733  2e-02   1  1  1 |  1  1
 7  -6.803e-01  -6.798e-01  +5e-05  9e-05  7e-05  6e-04  2e-05  0.7833  9e-03   2  1  1 |  1  1
 8  -6.800e-01  -6.799e-01  +1e-05  2e-05  2e-05  1e-04  5e-06  0.7746  2e-02   1  1  0 |  1  1
 9  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +3e-06  5e-06  4e-06  3e-05  1e-06  0.7833  9e-03   1  0  0 |  1  1
10  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +7e-07  1e-06  8e-07  7e-06  3e-07  0.7752  2e-02   1  0  0 |  1  1
11  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +1e-07  2e-07  2e-07  2e-06  6e-08  0.7833  9e-03   1  0  0 |  1  1
12  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +4e-08  6e-08  4e-08  3e-07  2e-08  0.7833  1e-02   1  0  0 |  1  1
13  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +6e-09  1e-08  1e-08  8e-08  3e-09  0.7833  9e-03   2  0  0 |  1  1
14  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +9e-10  1e-09  4e-10  2e-09  3e-10  0.9791  9e-03   0  0  0 |  1  0
15  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +2e-10  3e-10  2e-10  2e-09  8e-11  0.4010  3e-01   1  0  0 |  5  4
16  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +4e-11  7e-11  5e-11  4e-10  2e-11  0.7833  9e-03   0  0  0 |  1  1
17  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +1e-11  2e-11  1e-11  9e-11  4e-12  0.7833  9e-03   0  0  0 |  1  1
18  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +2e-12  4e-12  2e-12  2e-11  9e-13  0.7833  9e-03   1  0  0 |  1  1
19  -6.799e-01  -6.799e-01  +5e-13  8e-13  5e-13  4e-12  2e-13  0.7833  9e-03   1  0  0 |  1  1

OPTIMAL (within feastol=8.4e-13, reltol=7.5e-13, abstol=5.1e-13).
Runtime: 0.000326 seconds.

log_ax_x: ECOS failed to produce the desired precision
Tests run: 27

@tkelman
Copy link
Contributor

tkelman commented Nov 9, 2015

The failing test was added in the most recent commit - embotech/ecos@3595371. May be worth compiling on 32 bit Linux to see if it's not just a Windows problem.

@chriscoey
Copy link

@mlubin what's the status on this? am I slash should I be using the new version of ecos for my experiments?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented May 7, 2016

Everything should already be bumped to 2.0.4?

@chriscoey
Copy link

ok so this issue can be closed?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented May 7, 2016

Well except for the windows binaries

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Aug 4, 2016

Closed in favor of #47

@mlubin mlubin closed this as completed Aug 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants