Why cmark-gfm instead of jgm / commonmark-hs? #254
digitalmoksha
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 8 replies
-
|
I'm not sure what @kivikakk's reply will be, but I can guess: we were both at GitHub when the GFM spec came out; and indeed, @kivikakk worked on that very spec. This lib has gone on to evolve indepentently of GitHub/cmark-gfm and I'm sure any extension / suggestion that's PRed would be merged, a la #251 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm curious. What about porting from https://github.com/jgm/commonmark-hs rather than cmark-gfm? jgm as speced out extensions pretty well, it seems very extensible and supports source positions for all elements. And supports GFM.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions