Replies: 4 comments
-
|
I don't think fuzzing should be run on CI ever. CI tasks should be:
And neither of those are what fuzzing is known for. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Indeed, it is ad hoc. I am inclined to agree with @rlidwka's comment; it'd also take some effort to preserve the fuzzing run information between runs (so that we continue to explore new paths). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, that makes sense |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the answers! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello 👋
I was happy to see that
cargo fuzzis configured for this project! I was wondering what's the workflow to run fuzz testing in your development cycle? Is it ad hoc or is there a scheduled job configured somewhere?If it's not scheduled, would you be open to a contribution that adds a CI job that runs on a schedule or would that exhaust GitHub Action free minutes? I'm not sure how GitHub Action minutes work.
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions