[InstCombine] optimize powi(X,Y) * X with Ofast

Try to transform the powi(X, Y) * X into powi(X, Y+1) with Ofast

For this case, when the Y is 3, then powi(X, 4) is replaced by
X2 = X * X; X2 * X2 in the further step.
Similar to D109954, who requires reassoc.

Fixes #69862.

Author: vfdff

llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineMulDivRem.cpp

@@ -683,6 +683,18 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldFMulReassoc(BinaryOperator &I) {
     return replaceInstUsesWith(I, Pow);
   }
 
+  // powi(X, Y) * X --> powi(X, Y+1)
+  // X * powi(X, Y) --> powi(X, Y+1)
+  if (match(&I, m_c_FMul(m_OneUse(m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::powi>(m_Value(X),
+                                                               m_Value(Y))),
+                         m_Deferred(X))) &&
+      willNotOverflowSignedAdd(Y, ConstantInt::get(Y->getType(), 1), I)) {
+    auto *Y1 = Builder.CreateAdd(Y, ConstantInt::get(Y->getType(), 1));
+    auto *NewPow = Builder.CreateIntrinsic(
+        Intrinsic::powi, {X->getType(), Y1->getType()}, {X, Y1}, &I);
+    return replaceInstUsesWith(I, NewPow);
+  }
+
   if (I.isOnlyUserOfAnyOperand()) {
     // pow(X, Y) * pow(X, Z) -> pow(X, Y + Z)
     if (match(Op0, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::pow>(m_Value(X), m_Value(Y))) &&

llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/powi.ll

@@ -341,3 +341,52 @@ define double @fdiv_pow_powi_negative_variable(double %x, i32 %y) {
   %div = fdiv reassoc nnan double %p1, %x
   ret double %div
 }
+
+; powi(X, Y) * X --> powi(X, Y+1)
+define double @powi_fmul_powi_x(double noundef %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @powi_fmul_powi_x(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MUL:%.*]] = call reassoc double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double [[X:%.*]], i32 4)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret double [[MUL]]
+;
+  %p1 = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double %x, i32 3)
+  %mul = fmul reassoc double %p1, %x
+  ret double %mul
+}
+
+; Negative test: Multi-use
+define double @powi_fmul_powi_x_multi_use(double noundef %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @powi_fmul_powi_x_multi_use(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[P1:%.*]] = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double [[X:%.*]], i32 3)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    tail call void @use(double [[P1]])
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MUL:%.*]] = fmul reassoc double [[P1]], [[X]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret double [[MUL]]
+;
+  %p1 = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double %x, i32 3)
+  tail call void @use(double %p1)
+  %mul = fmul reassoc double %p1, %x
+  ret double %mul
+}
+
+; Negative test: Miss fmf flag
+define double @powi_fmul_powi_x_missing_reassoc(double noundef %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @powi_fmul_powi_x_missing_reassoc(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[P1:%.*]] = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double [[X:%.*]], i32 3)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MUL:%.*]] = fmul double [[P1]], [[X]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret double [[MUL]]
+;
+  %p1 = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double %x, i32 3)
+  %mul = fmul double %p1, %x
+  ret double %mul
+}
+
+; Negative test: overflow
+define double @powi_fmul_powi_x_overflow(double noundef %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @powi_fmul_powi_x_overflow(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[P1:%.*]] = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double [[X:%.*]], i32 2147483647)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MUL:%.*]] = fmul reassoc double [[P1]], [[X]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret double [[MUL]]
+;
+  %p1 = tail call double @llvm.powi.f64.i32(double %x, i32 2147483647) ; INT_MAX
+  %mul = fmul reassoc double %p1, %x
+  ret double %mul
+}