You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While trying to build Mesa with LLVM 20 I encountered Mesa bug #11945, which was triggered by libclang-20-dev shipping an invalid Symlink (/usr/lib/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.so.20.1) to a non-existent library (for amd64 eg. ../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libclang-cpp.so.20.1).
The invalid symlink switched the clover build in Mesa over to static linking. Mesa's missing static dependency will be fixed downstream, but it would be nice to be able to build Mesa with a link to clang-cpp.
The symlink should be /usr/lib/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.so.20.0 pointing to ../../${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libclang-cpp.so.20.0. Please correct the build scripts accordingly.
Please note: this might be a duplicate of #109153 or the two are very likely at least closely related. Since I do install my packages from apt.llvm.org and do not use llvm.sh, I will, however, not make such presumptions. Feel free to merge the tickets, if you believe it is the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While trying to build Mesa with LLVM 20 I encountered Mesa bug #11945, which was triggered by
libclang-20-dev
shipping an invalid Symlink (/usr/lib/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.so.20.1
) to a non-existent library (foramd64
eg.../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libclang-cpp.so.20.1
).The invalid symlink switched the
clover
build in Mesa over to static linking. Mesa's missing static dependency will be fixed downstream, but it would be nice to be able to build Mesa with a link toclang-cpp
.The symlink should be
/usr/lib/llvm-20/lib/libclang-cpp.so.20.0
pointing to../../${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libclang-cpp.so.20.0
. Please correct the build scripts accordingly.Please note: this might be a duplicate of #109153 or the two are very likely at least closely related. Since I do install my packages from
apt.llvm.org
and do not usellvm.sh
, I will, however, not make such presumptions. Feel free to merge the tickets, if you believe it is the same.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: