Skip to content

ai-assisted-pr-workflow.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
111 lines (73 loc) · 2.98 KB

ai-assisted-pr-workflow.md

File metadata and controls

111 lines (73 loc) · 2.98 KB
Raw

AI-Assisted Pull Request Workflow

This document defines how pull requests are prepared and finalized in this repository.

The goal is to keep the project:

  • educational,
  • auditable,
  • reproducible,
  • and readable for humans — even when AI is involved.

Why this exists

This repository demonstrates AI-assisted software delivery.

AI can significantly accelerate implementation, but without structure it can also:

  • reduce clarity,
  • obscure intent,
  • and produce shallow or misleading change history.

This workflow ensures that:

AI generates output, CI verifies it, and humans remain responsible for decisions.

When to use this workflow

Use this workflow at the end of each implementation phase, especially when:

  • code was generated or refined with AI,
  • architectural or tooling decisions were made,
  • the change is meant to be educational or demonstrational.

Final PR Preparation Prompt

When you are ready to open or finalize a pull request, start a new AI conversation and send the message below verbatim.

I’m about to finish this implementation step and would like you to help me prepare the GitHub pull request.

Please generate:

1. A clear, conventional PR title
2. A detailed PR description (educational, explaining _why_ decisions were made, not only _what_ was done)
3. A squash commit message that:
   - follows Conventional Commits
   - is verbose and descriptive
   - is suitable for a public, educational repository
   - summarizes the intent, scope, and key decisions of this change

Context:

- This is a demonstrational, production-grade project
- The repository is public
- The PR should be understandable for readers learning AI-assisted software development
- The PR description should reference architecture, DX, and quality considerations where relevant

I will paste the summary of changes below.

Commit Message Expectations

All commits and squash messages must follow these rules:

  • Use Conventional Commits
  • Be verbose and explanatory
  • Explain:
    • intent,
    • reasoning,
    • trade-offs,
    • and future implications where relevant

This repository prioritizes clarity over brevity in commit history.

Example Squash Commit Structure

feat(ci): introduce early CI quality gates for AI-assisted workflow

This change introduces CI pipelines immediately after repository
initialization to ensure that all subsequent AI-generated and
human-authored changes are validated consistently.

Key decisions:
- CI is treated as a first-class architectural component
- Conventional commits are enforced early to stabilize history
- Fast feedback loops are preferred over exhaustive pipelines

This approach aligns with the repository’s goal of demonstrating
production-grade AI-assisted software delivery.

Final Notes

  • CI is a guardrail, not a formality
  • Commit history is documentation
  • AI is a collaborator, not an authority

If something is unclear in the history, the process has failed — not the tools.