Skip to content

Magento EE 2.2.6 - adblocker blocks checkout functionality with minified/merged js #19212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
asim-vax opened this issue Nov 14, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed

Comments

@asim-vax
Copy link
Contributor

Preconditions (*)

1.php 7.1
2. Magento EE 2.2.6

Steps to reproduce (*)

) Installed vanilla Magento EE 2.2.6
2) created product (admin panel -> catalog -> products -> new product)
3) admin panel -> store -> config -> sales -> google API -> enabled -> YES
4) admin panel -> store -> config -> sales -> google API -> account number -> 12345
5) admin panel -> store -> config -> advanced -> developer -> javascript settings -> merge javascript -> YES
6) admin panel -> store -> config -> advanced -> developer -> javascript settings -> minify javascript -> YES
7) admin panel -> system -> cache -> refresh all caches
8) frontend visit product page -> add to cart
9) click mini basket -> proceed to cart
9a) with adblock turned off, this works
9b) with adblock turned on, this doesn't work, infinite loading circle

Expected result (*)

  1. checkout to load

Actual result (*)

  1. checkout has infinite loader
  2. error thrown error output:
    main.min.js:2 Error: Script error for: Magento_GoogleTagManager/js/google-analytics-universal
    http://requirejs.org/docs/errors.html#scripterror
    at makeError (44dbba8c0605596e4aba459b86c8d628.min.js:16)
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

magento-engcom-team commented Nov 14, 2018

Hi @asim-vax. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

  • Summary of the issue
  • Information on your environment
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento-engcom-team give me $VERSION instance

where $VERSION is version tags (starting from 2.2.0+) or develop branches (for example: 2.3-develop).
For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

@asim-vax do you confirm that you was able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?

  • yes
  • no

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed label Nov 14, 2018
@asim-vax
Copy link
Contributor Author

asim-vax commented Nov 14, 2018

Yes, confirm this is reproducible on vanilla magento enterprise 2.2.6
Possibly related to: #12428

@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

@asim-vax, according to #12428 (comment) this problem is reproduced only with Magento Commerce.

In such case

Please report Magento Commerce issues via the Support portal of your account or Partner portal if you are a partner reporting on behalf of a merchant.
GitHub is intended for Magento Open Source bug reports given no account management for Magento Open Source users. This will allow for proper tracking of issues at the account level.

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Nov 16, 2018
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @engcom-backlog-nazar. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.3-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.3-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.3.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch.

    Details- Add the comment @magento-engcom-team give me 2.2-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.2-develop branch, please add the label Reproduced on 2.2.x

  • 6. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 7. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 16, 2018

@asim-vax , thank you for your report. Please follow these guidelines for proper tracking of your issue. You can report Commerce-related issues in one of two ways:
You can use the Support portal associated with your account
or
If you are a Partner reporting on behalf of a merchant, use the Partner portal.

GitHub is intended for Magento Open Source users to report on issues related to Open Source only. There are no account management services associated with GitHub.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Nov 16, 2018
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants