We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From chrome-devtools-frontend (found in #26861)
// @Filename: file1.js var N = {} N.commands = {} // @Filename: file2.js N.commands.a = 111 N.commands.b = function () { }
Expected behavior: N.commands.a = 111 is a legal assignment declaration and references to N.commands.a have type number.
N.commands.a = 111
N.commands.a
Actual behavior: Both N.commands.a = 111 and references to N.commands.a say that "'a' is not found on 'commands'". N.commands.b is fine, though.
N.commands.b
Very likely a result of the change to expando marking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is not a 3.1 regression. It repros in 3.0 too.
Correction: There is no error in 3.0, although the type of 'a' is 'any'.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Completion is also hilariously broken. It suggests N.commands.N.N.N.N.N.N, although it gives the error "N does not exist on typeof commands".
N.commands.N.N.N.N.N.N
N
typeof commands
No branches or pull requests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
From chrome-devtools-frontend (found in #26861)
Expected behavior:
N.commands.a = 111
is a legal assignment declaration and references toN.commands.a
have type number.Actual behavior:
Both
N.commands.a = 111
and references toN.commands.a
say that "'a' is not found on 'commands'".N.commands.b
is fine, though.Very likely a result of the change to expando marking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: