Skip to content

Wrongly named cmdlets #223

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
peombwa opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #320
Closed

Wrongly named cmdlets #223

peombwa opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #320
Milestone

Comments

@peombwa
Copy link
Member

peombwa commented May 13, 2020

This issue it to keep track of cmdlets that are not properly named.

@ghost ghost added the ToTriage label May 13, 2020
@peombwa
Copy link
Member Author

peombwa commented May 13, 2020

@MIchaelMainer MIchaelMainer added this to the 0.7.0 milestone May 14, 2020
@tommymaynard
Copy link

I have to admit, I'm curious to know why the Connect and Disconnect cmdlets from the Microsoft.Graph.Authentication module don't include the "Mg" prefix. It seems as though these should include the prefix, as they're members of a Microsoft.Graph.* module. Additionally, it's possible that the first cmdlet to which someone may be introduced will be Connect-Graph. Why then shouldn't this command include the prefix? There's over 3,500 commands and as best as I can tell, only two didn't get the prefix. That should keep someone awake at night; it would me. ;)

@KirkMunro
Copy link

#75 was logged a while ago and should be tracked as part of this "bucket" issue.

@darrelmiller darrelmiller modified the milestones: 0.7.0 , 0.9.0 Jun 10, 2020
@mabster
Copy link

mabster commented Jul 9, 2020

Just spotted Get-MgBusinessFlowTemplateBusinessFlowTemplateBusinessFlowTemplate in module version 0.7.0.

This was referenced Aug 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants