You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am considering whether it would be feasible to further accelerate the process using a GPU (such as CuPy).
As mentioned in #63 , using CuPy should speed up some operators, but my implementation did not observe a significant speed increase (in fact, it significantly decreased). (I simply replaced numpy with cupy in aggregate_numpy.py )
Do you have some ideas on implementations on GPU?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @zjzjwang We only had this PR so far, you probably saw it: #63 . The problem with this algorithm is, that it is hard to parallelize. Which is, what the GPU would be good for. See here for approaches for further parallelization: https://github.com/xarray-contrib/flox
Thank you for your excellent work.
I am considering whether it would be feasible to further accelerate the process using a GPU (such as CuPy).
As mentioned in #63 , using CuPy should speed up some operators, but my implementation did not observe a significant speed increase (in fact, it significantly decreased). (I simply replaced numpy with cupy in aggregate_numpy.py )
Do you have some ideas on implementations on GPU?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: