Skip to content

Commit bd1ede9

Browse files
jason-price-mongodbjason-price-mongodb
andauthored
DOCSP-35701-timeseries-updates (#5954) (#5995)
* DOCSP-35701-timeseries-updates * DOCSP-35701-timeseries-updates * DOCSP-35701-timeseries-updates * DOCSP-35701-timeseries-updates --------- Co-authored-by: jason-price-mongodb <[email protected]>
1 parent 6c9a620 commit bd1ede9

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-7
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-7
lines changed

source/core/timeseries-collections.txt

Lines changed: 8 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -98,19 +98,20 @@ store data in time-order. This format provides the following benefits:
9898
Behavior
9999
~~~~~~~~
100100

101-
Time series collections behave like normal collections. You can insert
102-
and query your data as you normally would.
101+
Time series collections behave like typical collections. You insert
102+
and query data as usual.
103103

104104
MongoDB treats time series collections as writable non-materialized
105105
:ref:`views <views-landing-page>` backed by an internal collection. When
106106
you insert data, the internal collection automatically organizes time
107107
series data into an optimized storage format.
108108

109-
Since MongoDB 6.3, when you create a new time series collection, MongodDB
110-
generates a :ref:`compound index <index-create-compound>` on the
111-
:ref:`metaField and timeField <time-series-fields>` fields. Queries on time
112-
series collections take advantage of this index, as well as the optimized
113-
storage format, to improve query performance.
109+
Starting in MongoDB 6.3: if you create a new time series collection,
110+
MongoDB also generates a :ref:`compound index <index-create-compound>`
111+
on the :ref:`metaField and timeField <time-series-fields>` fields. To
112+
improve query performance, queries on time series collections use the
113+
new compound index. The compound index also uses the optimized storage
114+
format.
114115

115116
.. tip::
116117

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)