Skip to content

Add and display references to "Virtual circuits" from Provider view #18989

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
dejantep opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19335
Closed

Add and display references to "Virtual circuits" from Provider view #18989

dejantep opened this issue Mar 24, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #19335
Assignees
@renatoalmeidaoliveira
Labels
complexity: low Requires minimal effort to implement status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Milestone
v4.2.9

Comments

@dejantep
Copy link

NetBox version

v4.2.5

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Circuits and Virtual circuits share provider data but there are no references when looking at single provider.
There are no virtual circuits under "related objects".
Virtual circuits are not listed like circuits in overview

Use case

This functionality would make it much easier to get a clear overview of provider and their respective circuits whether those are physical or virtual.

Database changes

maybe relations?

External dependencies

none
@dejantep dejantep added status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application labels Mar 24, 2025
@jnovinger jnovinger added status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation complexity: low Requires minimal effort to implement and removed status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer labels Mar 27, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels Apr 24, 2025
This was referenced Apr 25, 2025
Closed
Merged
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added this to the v4.2.9 milestone Apr 28, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Apr 30, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@renatoalmeidaoliveira renatoalmeidaoliveira

Labels
complexity: low Requires minimal effort to implement status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.2.9
4 participants
@jnovinger @jeremystretch @renatoalmeidaoliveira @dejantep