$ PYTHONMALLOC=malloc valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=definite,indirect --suppressions=pybind11/tests/valgrind-python.supp --gen-suppressions=all python3.9-dbg -c "import numpy, sys; print(numpy.__version__); print(sys.version); print(sys.abiflags)"
==12402== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==12402== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==12402== Using Valgrind-3.16.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==12402== Command: python3.9-dbg -c import\ numpy,\ sys;\ print(numpy.__version__);\ print(sys.version);\ print(sys.abiflags)
==12402== 
1.20.0
3.9.1 (default, Dec  8 2020, 03:24:52) 
[GCC 7.5.0]
d
==12402== 
==12402== HEAP SUMMARY:
==12402==     in use at exit: 3,340,248 bytes in 20,455 blocks
==12402==   total heap usage: 316,728 allocs, 296,273 frees, 47,690,767 bytes allocated
==12402== 
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 1,062 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x164BA430: __Pyx_InitCachedConstants (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x164BB420: __pyx_pymod_exec__generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: indirect
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__Pyx_InitCachedConstants
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,063 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x14C3B9D7: __pyx_pymod_exec_mtrand (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/mtrand.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_mtrand
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,064 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7B64: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,065 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x151009B4: __pyx_pymod_exec__common (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_common.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__common
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,066 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x15A165B7: __pyx_pymod_exec__bounded_integers (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_bounded_integers.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__bounded_integers
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,067 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x15C6661D: __pyx_pymod_exec__mt19937 (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_mt19937.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__mt19937
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,068 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x15E7E837: __pyx_pymod_exec__philox (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_philox.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__philox
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,069 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x160930A7: __pyx_pymod_exec__pcg64 (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_pcg64.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__pcg64
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,070 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x160930C3: __pyx_pymod_exec__pcg64 (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_pcg64.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__pcg64
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,071 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x162A3B42: __pyx_pymod_exec__sfc64 (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_sfc64.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__sfc64
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,072 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x162A3B5E: __pyx_pymod_exec__sfc64 (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_sfc64.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__sfc64
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,073 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x164BA1BC: __Pyx_InitCachedConstants (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x164BB420: __pyx_pymod_exec__generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__Pyx_InitCachedConstants
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
}
==12402== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 2,041 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473CA4: _PyTuple_FromArray (tupleobject.c:420)
==12402==    by 0x42DE4D: _PyObject_MakeTpCall (call.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x4D58B2: _PyObject_VectorcallTstate (abstract.h:116)
==12402==    by 0x4D58B2: PyObject_Vectorcall (abstract.h:127)
==12402==    by 0x4D58B2: call_function (ceval.c:5072)
==12402==    by 0x4D58B2: _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault (ceval.c:3518)
==12402==    by 0x42E8EC: _PyEval_EvalFrame (pycore_ceval.h:40)
==12402==    by 0x42E8EC: function_code_fastcall (call.c:329)
==12402==    by 0x42E649: _PyFunction_Vectorcall (call.c:366)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: indirect
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:_PyTuple_FromArray
   fun:_PyObject_MakeTpCall
   fun:_PyObject_VectorcallTstate
   fun:PyObject_Vectorcall
   fun:call_function
   fun:_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault
   fun:_PyEval_EvalFrame
   fun:function_code_fastcall
   fun:_PyFunction_Vectorcall
}
==12402== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 2,861 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473CA4: _PyTuple_FromArray (tupleobject.c:420)
==12402==    by 0x42DE4D: _PyObject_MakeTpCall (call.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x42EDBC: _PyObject_VectorcallTstate (abstract.h:116)
==12402==    by 0x42EDBC: _PyObject_CallFunctionVa (call.c:542)
==12402==    by 0x42FA4F: PyObject_CallFunction (call.c:564)
==12402==    by 0x4F648C: PyImport_Import (import.c:2073)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: indirect
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:_PyTuple_FromArray
   fun:_PyObject_MakeTpCall
   fun:_PyObject_VectorcallTstate
   fun:_PyObject_CallFunctionVa
   fun:PyObject_CallFunction
   fun:PyImport_Import
}
==12402== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 2,862 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7D98: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: indirect
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 2,863 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473E38: PyTuple_Pack (tupleobject.c:208)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7E1A: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: indirect
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_Pack
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
}
==12402== 168 bytes in 3 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 3,380 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x52CE7B: _PyObject_GC_Alloc (gcmodule.c:2225)
==12402==    by 0x52CE47: _PyObject_GC_Malloc (gcmodule.c:2252)
==12402==    by 0x52CFB3: _PyObject_GC_NewVar (gcmodule.c:2281)
==12402==    by 0x473BD1: tuple_alloc (tupleobject.c:92)
==12402==    by 0x473A14: PyTuple_New (tupleobject.c:110)
==12402==    by 0x4584B9: dictiter_iternextitem (dictobject.c:3866)
==12402==    by 0x4423E1: list_extend (listobject.c:921)
==12402==    by 0x4422A3: _PyList_Extend (listobject.c:961)
==12402==    by 0x607CC8: PySequence_List (abstract.c:2005)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: indirect
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Alloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_GC_NewVar
   fun:tuple_alloc
   fun:PyTuple_New
   fun:dictiter_iternextitem
   fun:list_extend
   fun:_PyList_Extend
   fun:PySequence_List
}
==12402== 224 (176 direct, 48 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,518 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x164BA479: __Pyx_InitCachedConstants (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x164BB420: __pyx_pymod_exec__generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__Pyx_InitCachedConstants
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
}
==12402== 232 (176 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,558 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x14C3BA40: __pyx_pymod_exec_mtrand (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/mtrand.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402==    by 0x62B63F: cfunction_vectorcall_O (methodobject.c:512)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_mtrand
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
   fun:cfunction_vectorcall_O
}
==12402== 232 (176 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,559 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x14C3BAAD: __pyx_pymod_exec_mtrand (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/mtrand.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402==    by 0x62B63F: cfunction_vectorcall_O (methodobject.c:512)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_mtrand
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
   fun:cfunction_vectorcall_O
}
==12402== 232 (176 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,560 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7BF1: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402==    by 0x62B63F: cfunction_vectorcall_O (methodobject.c:512)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
   fun:cfunction_vectorcall_O
}
==12402== 240 (176 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,567 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7C66: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402==    by 0x62B63F: cfunction_vectorcall_O (methodobject.c:512)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
   fun:cfunction_vectorcall_O
}
==12402== 256 (176 direct, 80 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,588 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7DDE: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402==    by 0x62B63F: cfunction_vectorcall_O (methodobject.c:512)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
   fun:cfunction_vectorcall_O
}
==12402== 256 (176 direct, 80 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,589 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x14ED7E60: __pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/bit_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402==    by 0x62B63F: cfunction_vectorcall_O (methodobject.c:512)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec_bit_generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
   fun:cfunction_vectorcall_O
}
==12402== 256 (176 direct, 80 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3,590 of 4,401
==12402==    at 0x4C31ECB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==12402==    by 0x467566: _PyMem_RawMalloc (obmalloc.c:99)
==12402==    by 0x468168: PyObject_Malloc (obmalloc.c:685)
==12402==    by 0x4642D1: _PyObject_New (object.c:165)
==12402==    by 0x61A175: PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs (codeobject.c:223)
==12402==    by 0x61CB0D: PyCode_New (codeobject.c:274)
==12402==    by 0x164BA5AA: __Pyx_InitCachedConstants (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x164BB420: __pyx_pymod_exec__generator (in /home/yannick/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/random/_generator.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so)
==12402==    by 0x46228A: PyModule_ExecDef (moduleobject.c:399)
==12402==    by 0x4F55BB: exec_builtin_or_dynamic (import.c:2245)
==12402==    by 0x4F80DF: _imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2 (import.c:2319)
==12402==    by 0x4F80B4: _imp_exec_dynamic (import.c.h:358)
==12402== 
{
   <insert_a_suppression_name_here>
   Memcheck:Leak
   match-leak-kinds: definite
   fun:malloc
   fun:_PyMem_RawMalloc
   fun:PyObject_Malloc
   fun:_PyObject_New
   fun:PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
   fun:PyCode_New
   fun:__Pyx_InitCachedConstants
   fun:__pyx_pymod_exec__generator
   fun:PyModule_ExecDef
   fun:exec_builtin_or_dynamic
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic_impl.constprop.2
   fun:_imp_exec_dynamic
}
==12402== LEAK SUMMARY:
==12402==    definitely lost: 1,936 bytes in 19 blocks
==12402==    indirectly lost: 520 bytes in 8 blocks
==12402==      possibly lost: 2,959,093 bytes in 19,287 blocks
==12402==    still reachable: 378,283 bytes in 1,133 blocks
==12402==         suppressed: 416 bytes in 8 blocks
==12402== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==12402== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==12402== 
==12402== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==12402== ERROR SUMMARY: 4194 errors from 4194 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)