You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current behavior for barY is overlapping bars when specified as {x, y} since this is equivalent to {x, y1 = 0, y2 = y}. If the bars (or areas) are opaque, this can obscure the data. Perhaps we could have implicit stacking by default, such that if the barY is specified as {x, y} (i.e. if y1 and y2 are undefined) then we implicitly apply the stackY transform to create them. And you could always opt-out of stacking by explicitly setting y1 to zero if desired (maybe we could allow y1 to be specified as a constant number, so that y1: 0 works).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd say it's fine as it is at this "lower" level, but it should definitely be here by default in a higher-level "Histogram component". Same maybe for a stacked area chart, which should include the seriesX transform (#325) by default.
The current behavior for barY is overlapping bars when specified as {x, y} since this is equivalent to {x, y1 = 0, y2 = y}. If the bars (or areas) are opaque, this can obscure the data. Perhaps we could have implicit stacking by default, such that if the barY is specified as {x, y} (i.e. if y1 and y2 are undefined) then we implicitly apply the stackY transform to create them. And you could always opt-out of stacking by explicitly setting y1 to zero if desired (maybe we could allow y1 to be specified as a constant number, so that
y1: 0
works).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: