Skip to content

Integrate a training feature to pass JSON markup convo data #54

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
4R7I5T opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Integrate a training feature to pass JSON markup convo data #54

4R7I5T opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@4R7I5T
Copy link

4R7I5T commented Feb 19, 2019

Other alternatives to this software have allowed such a system to exist problem free, cakechat by Replika.ai for example; allows and encourages people to check out the 40GB reddit corpus you guys build GPT-2 from. I was getting highly similar results with altering their token model and marking up the JSON with emotion compared to what I am seeing with your currently released solution.

Examples of things more dangerous than your software that turned out safer than imagined...:

Example #1: Fusor.net provides detailed instructions on how to build a nuclear fusion reactor, 12 year olds in south america have even made them. Yet Bogota hasn't become Chernobyl.

Example #2: 3D printed weapons have been around for years and actually are far more safe / less accessible than normal weapons. Nobody has ever been harmed by one.

Example #3: The early days of Bitcoin, although they were accompanied by some awful things - didn't do anything as bad as what the Sinaloa cartel managed under El Chapo daily for decades unchecked.

I'll protest this until I get my own copy of this software. It's a human right for you guys to release your full, open and honest production software instead of choose profit and proprietary.

@WuTheFWasThat
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your examples. We're completely open to the idea that our software isn't dangerous, and different people within the org have differing views. However, we've decided to proceed cautiously and to start a conversation around these topics.

I don't think there's an issue specific to this repository so i'm closing this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants