zsmalloc: fix races between modifications of fullness and isolated

We encountered many kernel exceptions of VM_BUG_ON(zspage->isolated ==
0) in dec_zspage_isolation() and BUG_ON(!pages[1]) in zs_unmap_object()
lately.  This issue only occurs when migration and reclamation occur at
the same time.

With our memory stress test, we can reproduce this issue several times
a day.  We have no idea why no one else encountered this issue.  BTW,
we switched to the new kernel version with this defect a few months
ago.

Since fullness and isolated share the same unsigned int, modifications of
them should be protected by the same lock.

[[email protected]: move comment]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: c4549b8 ("zsmalloc: remove zspage isolation for migration")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Yang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Author: QQXanadu

mm/zsmalloc.c

@@ -1798,6 +1798,7 @@ static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
 
 static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
 {
+	struct zs_pool *pool;
 	struct zspage *zspage;
 
 	/*
@@ -1807,9 +1808,10 @@ static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageIsolated(page), page);
 
 	zspage = get_zspage(page);
-	migrate_write_lock(zspage);
+	pool = zspage->pool;
+	spin_lock(&pool->lock);
 	inc_zspage_isolation(zspage);
-	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
+	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1875,12 +1877,12 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
 	kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
 
 	replace_sub_page(class, zspage, newpage, page);
+	dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
 	/*
 	 * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
 	 * it's okay to release the pool's lock.
 	 */
 	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
-	dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
 	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
 
 	get_page(newpage);
@@ -1897,14 +1899,16 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
 
 static void zs_page_putback(struct page *page)
 {
+	struct zs_pool *pool;
 	struct zspage *zspage;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageIsolated(page), page);
 
 	zspage = get_zspage(page);
-	migrate_write_lock(zspage);
+	pool = zspage->pool;
+	spin_lock(&pool->lock);
 	dec_zspage_isolation(zspage);
-	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
+	spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 }
 
 static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops = {