Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Why are you starting this discussion?
Question
What GitHub Actions topic or product is this about?
Workflow Configuration
Discussion Details
We're currently in Bitbucket and would like to move over to GitHub. I've started testing with one repository, and I'm mostly there. However, we seem unable to replicate our current usage of Bitbucket pipelines:
This doesn't fit our working model which I'd like to keep in place at least for now.
Granted, we're currently on the free tier as we're still in the experimental phase; but I can't see anything that matches this idea in any of the features list, not even for Enterprise level. Am I missing something, or how do others implement this kind of practice?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions