Unexpected empty input/output fields in traces when using LangFuse #10720
Unanswered
ArtikMastik
asked this question in
Support
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Thanks @ArtikMastik, can you observe a pattern for the traces where this is the case, or does it seem to be random? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe your question
Hi,
I’m using LangFuse and noticing that some of my trace/observation entries show empty input/output fields, even though the underlying LLM calls definitely have content.
I saw the FAQ entry here:
https://langfuse.com/faq/all/empty-trace-input-and-output
but I don’t fully see how it applies to my case or why these specific observations end up with empty values.
My setup:
Using the Langfuse callback handler
Inputs and outputs are present in the actual LLM responses
Only some lines are missing the data, not all
I’m not manually removing or redacting anything
Could someone explain why this happens or guide me on how to debug it properly?
Thanks!
Langfuse Cloud or Self-Hosted?
Self-Hosted
If Self-Hosted
v3.118.0
If Langfuse Cloud
No response
SDK and integration versions
No response
Pre-Submission Checklist
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions