You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When performing the .mask method on a dataframe, it is expected that a value will be replaced by another value (in this case 0) when the condition result is True. However, when the condition result is pd.NA, it is now also being handled like it is True which is incorrect behaviour. I guess that the same problem happens when using the dataframe.where() method since .mask and .where are linked. It also happens for pd.Float64Dtype().
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
(optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandas.
Note: Please read this guide detailing how to provide the necessary information for us to reproduce your bug.
Code Sample, a copy-pastable example
Actual output:
Problem description
When performing the .mask method on a dataframe, it is expected that a value will be replaced by another value (in this case 0) when the condition result is True. However, when the condition result is pd.NA, it is now also being handled like it is True which is incorrect behaviour. I guess that the same problem happens when using the dataframe.where() method since .mask and .where are linked. It also happens for pd.Float64Dtype().
Expected Output
expected = pd.Series([4, 0, pd.NA], dtype=pd.Int64Dtype(), name="C")
Output of
pd.show_versions()
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : f2c8480
python : 3.9.1.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Windows
OS-release : 10
Version : 10.0.19041
machine : AMD64
processor : Intel64 Family 6 Model 63 Stepping 2, GenuineIntel
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : None
LOCALE : English_United States.1252
pandas : 1.2.3
numpy : 1.20.1
pytz : 2021.1
dateutil : 2.8.1
pip : 21.0.1
setuptools : 52.0.0
Cython : None
pytest : 6.2.2
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 2.11.3
IPython : None
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
fsspec : None
fastparquet : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.7
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : 1.6.1
sqlalchemy : 1.4.2
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : 1.2.0
xlwt : None
numba : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: