You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Electrical mismatch loss due to cell-to-cell irradiance nonuniformity is relevant for bifacial system performance, but pvlib does not offer any tools to model this. PVMismatch can, but maybe I don't want to learn a new tool, maybe I don't have 2-diode model parameters, maybe I don't want another dependency, maybe I just want a quick mismatch estimate without the computational burden of a full I-V circuit solver...
The model itself is straightforward: given irradiance at several locations across a module, summarize the irradiance variation using mean absolute difference and feed that into a polynomial with known coefficients. What might be more difficult is deciding what the structure of the inputs should be, as we don't currently have a data structure convention for representing multiple irradiance values for a single module. It must be at least 2D (time, location in module), but maybe 3D would be better to allow vectorization across modules.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Of course a full I-V curve circuit simulator is still desirable in the long run, but this model is a lot simpler both to implement and to use. No reason not to have both IMHO.
Additional context
pvfactors will give you localized/partitioned irradiance going up the row height if you ask it nicely; perhaps we should add a gallery example demonstrating how to do that. I don't think the infinite sheds code can return irradiance for small parts of the module, can it?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Electrical mismatch loss due to cell-to-cell irradiance nonuniformity is relevant for bifacial system performance, but pvlib does not offer any tools to model this. PVMismatch can, but maybe I don't want to learn a new tool, maybe I don't have 2-diode model parameters, maybe I don't want another dependency, maybe I just want a quick mismatch estimate without the computational burden of a full I-V circuit solver...
Describe the solution you'd like
One of the many feature requests suggested at PVPMC (thanks @shirubana!) is an implementation of the reduced order electrical mismatch model described in Deline, Pelaez et al 2020, "Estimating and parameterizing mismatch power loss in bifacial photovoltaic systems".
The model itself is straightforward: given irradiance at several locations across a module, summarize the irradiance variation using mean absolute difference and feed that into a polynomial with known coefficients. What might be more difficult is deciding what the structure of the inputs should be, as we don't currently have a data structure convention for representing multiple irradiance values for a single module. It must be at least 2D (time, location in module), but maybe 3D would be better to allow vectorization across modules.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Of course a full I-V curve circuit simulator is still desirable in the long run, but this model is a lot simpler both to implement and to use. No reason not to have both IMHO.
Additional context
pvfactors
will give you localized/partitioned irradiance going up the row height if you ask it nicely; perhaps we should add a gallery example demonstrating how to do that. I don't think the infinite sheds code can return irradiance for small parts of the module, can it?bifacial_radiance
already has a BSD-3 implementation we could use as a starting point:https://github.com/NREL/bifacial_radiance/blob/5f9de36861ec9bcffe169c9a4371806860c0e224/bifacial_radiance/mismatch.py#L166-L220
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: